September 30,2022
Coker v Austin
In the case of COKER v. AUSTIN, DTR is representing armed service members against the DOD's COVID-19 injection mandate, which unlawfully requires these brave men and women to be part of an experiment in an unapproved and dangerous injection in violation of federal law and contrary to their right of informed consent.
Nearly one year after the DOD COVID-19 vaccine mandate took effect, the defendants produced what they said was a "Comirnaty-labeled" mRNA vaccine from "Lot FW1331" made in a Kalamazoo, Michigan facility. However, publicly available documents – all obtained from government websites – demonstrate that this Kalamazoo facility was not an FDA-licensed manufacturing facility at the time Lot FW1331 was produced. These documents also reveal that Lot FW1331 was listed in the CDC's Emergency Use Authorization database. To summarize, this "Comirnaty- labeled" vaccine is not an FDA-license product - it is an experimental one that cannot be mandated.
If the government's own documents are to be believed, then there is the potential that these products may have been intentionally misbranded. In light of this information, and to get to the bottom of these potentially explosive developments, DTR has requested the court to allow for an evidentiary hearing where DTR can present this evidence, examine its witnesses, and cross-examine the government's witnesses.
You can read the evidence submitted in support of the motion, Click Here: COKER V AUSTIN
###
We can only defend these service members because of your support. Please help us continue to expose government corruption and defend our precious service members by making a monthly contribution.
Regardless of who wins any election, to have confidence in the outcome, we must continue to demand (1) real paper ballots, (2) hand counted in a bipartisan transparent process, and (3) citizen voter ID.
Missed a newsletter or to revisit a past newsletter? They are archived HERE .
Comments or Questions? Contact: editor@defendingtherepublic.org