.... The contrast could not be more clear.

Aug 07, 2024

Dear Patriot,

To take the attention from the very bad and tanking US and world economy, the Dems blurted out their Veep selection.

It is a very uninspiring choice, but then the Dems do not have much to choose from.

We won’t pay too much attention to the Kamala/Tim ticket yet, it could change... again!

However, as it stands at the moment, we have two candidates who hate America running against two candidates who love America. The difference is clear.

In this newsletter we….

speculate on why the Dems allowed such a lackluster slate.
are hopeful that a small change may reap great results.
remain alert to vaccine trends in Europe.
rejoice over the possible end to information control.
share a book on the Deep State.

Access EVERY article for only ……………. $5 / month

Kind note from a subscriber:

Hello, Sidney and Team –
This issue hit it out of the ballpark – cheered me up no end. You guys are awesome.
We so need a Great Awakening!
Thanks for all you do,
P. A.

1- It seems that all sides are wondering about Kamala’s running mate pick. Tim Waltz is a far, far, far left socialist without much pizazz. But, he means business. He set up a Snitch Line in Minnesota so neighbors could call the government and rat each other out for violating Covid-CCP mandates.

Ward Clark at RedState

Is Harris/Walz a Throwaway Ticket?

QUOTE: This has already been a weird election cycle, and no, I'm not talking about anything JD Vance said about cat ladies. It's the Democrats that are behaving strangely, even for them - and given that they have been maintaining a Weekend at Bernie's presidency for almost four years, keeping befuddled old Joe Biden in place, insisting he was "sharp as a tack" and "on his game" until they couldn't hide the fact any longer that His Dessicatedness has lost it. So now they have anointed Joe's life insurance policy, Kamala Harris, Queen of the Word Salad. And as RedState informed you, she has picked Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her VP.
So why did Kamala Harris pick the pale, pasty-white, far-left Governor of Minnesota, a state that was sure to go to the Democrats in the Electoral College in any case? And why did Eric "Fast and Furious" Holder, who was in charge of vetting candidates for her, recommend this guy?
He brings nothing to the table. He has no moderate chops to balance Kamala's commie-progressive stances. Minnesota, as noted, was an Electoral College win for the Dems in any case, barring Trump somehow turning in a 1972 Nixon-style 49-state landslide - that is the last time Minnesota's Electoral College votes went to a Republican. And then there's the lemon peel bit.
The choice is a little baffling. The only choice that might have been worse would be Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, whose incompetence both as Mayor of South Bend, Indiana and in his current role is legendary.
There is one possible explanation.
In 1996, it was generally accepted that Democrat Bill Clinton was going to coast to a reelection victory. He did. The GOP, perhaps (as has always been my suspicion), nominated good old Bob Dole. Dole was one of the senior party members, a WW2 hero, and had been gunning for the top spot for some time - but who, in a party with fresh memories of Ronald Reagan, didn't blow up many skirts. So the party nominated him, took the L, and came back stronger in 2000.
Could the Democrats be doing this now? Could the Harris/Walz ticket be a sacrificial lamb? Will the Dems punt on the 2024 election and hope to find a better candidate to face JD Vance in 2028? Granted they could hardly find a worse one, and the selection of Walz doesn't help her odds any.
I may be reading too much into this. But this is one possible explanation for why Kamala Harris and her people made such a bafflingly bad choice.